tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2260432230294560411.post1222386276767644389..comments2009-12-02T10:17:32.219-08:00SpringFusehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04653245696562919376noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2260432230294560411.post-56048234923686497122009-12-02T10:17:32.219-08:002009-12-02T10:17:32.219-08:00I have been trying to use JIBX because I had a lot of difficulties with JAXB not being very configurable and then still having to hand modify the generated xsd. Problem I am having with JIBX is that it doesn't appear to be able to handle maps.... This is a show stopper for me. Have you found a decent way to handle maps with JIXB?cyberoblivionhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13368523032781841267noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2260432230294560411.post-68426055191258662812009-10-03T15:29:30.569-07:002009-10-03T15:29:30.569-07:00Have fun patching jibx-instrumented classes. We have switched from JiBX to JAXB mainly because of that reason. JiBX instrument classes in a special post-compile step. This instrumentation must be done "all at once" and you CAN'T use file from one run with files from another run. This means you can't patch. JiBX is nicer, faster, easier to use - but this instrumentation too high a price to pay for all of this.Ran Bironhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13745439632196949633noreply@blogger.com